Small Business Ad Rewards

A brand new rewards program for small businesses advertising on Facebook.

My role

Content Designer

team

Product designer

Product manager

Data scientist

Engineers

timeline

12+ months

(03/22 – 04/23)

Problem

Small businesses (SMBs) make up a large part of Facebook’s ad users, but they have a lot of churn. There’s not much incentive to continue advertising on Facebook, especially when it’s not the most intuitive to use.

Goal

Create a rewards program that encourages SMBs to advertise more

Business goals

Decrease user churn

Help SMBs reach AVO

Boost Meta’s ad revenue

User goals

Get free ad credits (yay)

Become more comfortable with Ads Manager

Around 4M small businesses haven’t reached a threshold of specific ad conversions (AVO, aka Advertisers with Valuable Outcomes), and are at a higher risk (50-70%) of churning.

project

ideate

Before we started designing, we needed to think about strategy and information architecture. We came up with:

Key features of the program

$1 = 1 point

Welcome Offer (10x point multiplier)

Challenges (ways to earn extra points based on performance-driving actions identified in H1’22)


Entry points

Notification

Newsfeed

Megaphone


Key features of the dashboard

Total points accumulated

Rewards (upcoming and currently available)

Naming the feature

Since this was a net new program, I had to come up with a name that was intuitive, original, not too long, and preferably 3 words or less (per Brand’s recommendation).


We didn’t have a lot of leeway;

“Small Business” was a must so SMBs would know they were the intended audience,

“Rewards” was a must because it would otherwise not be clear what type of program it was, and

“Ad/Advertiser” was a must, per Brand’s input.


I conducted competitive analysis of other companies’ reward programs to gain an understanding of program names, and we were able to test a few in beta. We eventually were able to negotiate shortening “Advertiser” to “Ad,” which also helped reduce visual clutter in the designs.

design

Points progress bar

User can see points earned and a link to their points history

(Future) rewards

Cards here will show potential reward options. Locked rewards show the image at 50% opacity. Once the user unlocks the reward, the text will become a "Redeem" button.

A “how it works” tl;dr

Reminds users about the details of the rewards program, since they only see the "Intro to rewards" screen once.

FAQs

Frequently asked questions about ad credits, points, and other parts of the program

What we launched with (v0)

iterations

Feedback and iterations

01

Users weren’t signing up for the program

02

The users who did sign up rarely completed the program

03

A lot of users never went back to the program dashboard

v0 problems

Hypotheses

01

The current content wasn’t clear and/or enticing enough

02

There weren’t enough returning entry points, so users weren’t able to find their way back

We learned that on average, the Rewards program dashboard had around 2.5% daily impressions from all advertisers and a 10% clickthrough rate. This indicated that not many advertisers were returning to the dashboard after enrolling.

This screen had a ~60% drop-off rate


We thought there might be a few reasons:


Visually overwhelming—too much copy

It’s too complicated to immediately understand, which leads to users not wanting to engage

It’s not immediately clear what this is—might be an ad or a scam

More enticing headline

A very high-level allusion to what the program entails.

Adding the program name

So users know it's not a scam.

Updating the body copy

More VP-focused. Combining the "how it works" steps into one sentence hopefully makes it less intimidating.

Introductory screen

Notification

Megaphone

Newsfeed

New entry points

Refined messaging

Emphasized the value props of the program (getting $50 in ad credits)

Promotes the program

Reminds users that

the program exists

they can earn rewards

Interstitials

Context

Solution

Users have to go through an “Ad creation” flow in Ads Manager in order to create an ad. I wanted to test adding a new entry point/upsell to this flow, since advertisers who are actively running ads are our exact target audience.

Create two interstitial screens that would appear after the advertiser clicks on the original “Promote website” CTA

Interstitial ver. A

Shown when users just ran an ad that would’ve earned them enough points to immediately redeem a $10 ad credit

Interstitial ver. B

Shown when the spend for the most recent ad wouldn’t be enough to redeem a $10 ad credit

The original flow. Clicking “Promote website” takes you directly to the second screen.

“Challenges”

Context

Solution

“Challenges” were an opportunity for the user to earn extra points, but had low engagement. At the time, users could only access Challenges after completing the initial Welcome Offer. We knew that they were still running ads post-Welcome Offer, but weren’t enrolling in Challenges, which meant they were losing out on easy points.

Rework the logic behind Challenges and improve engagement. To do this, we:

Changed the program logic so that users could complete the Welcome Offer and Challenges at the same time

Added new entry and re-entry points

Explorations and a lot of talking to myself

Dissecting “Challenges” as a feature

To work through the logic, I broke down the rewards program into 3 key parts:

01

Users earn 1 point for every $1 spent

02

When you join the program, you get 10x points on the first $50 you spend (aka Welcome Offer)

03

Users can opt into Challenges. They get points for completing the Challenge in addition to the points they get for spending money.

Right now users have to finish the Welcome Offer (i.e. spend $50) before they can unlock and start opting into Challenges. We want to explore having Challenges being available from the beginning, meaning that there will be an overlap with the 10x points Welcome Offer. However, since the 10x points only applies to $ spent and not points earned, the math is tricky and will probably confuse users. See scenarios below for more explanation.

For these scenarios, the first Challenge is to spend $30 on an ad and run an ad for 7 days. This Challenge is worth 30 points.

scenario 1

User completes the first Challenge right after enrolling into the program. They haven’t spent money on ads other than the one from the Challenge.



The user spent $30, so they earn 30 points. With the 10x Welcome Offer, those 30 points -> 300 points. They also get an additional 30 points for completing the challenge.


Total points: 300 + 30 = 330

scenario 2

User already has 400 points. They start and complete the first Challenge.

If the user already has 400 points, that means they’ve already spent $40, so there’s $10 left in the Welcome Offer. They spend $30 on the Challenge, so the 10x multiplier applies to $10, and the regular $1 = 1 point rule applies to the other $20. They also get an additional 30 points for completing the Challenge.


Total points: ($10*10) + ($20*1) + 30 = 150

scenario 3

User starts and completes the first challenge after completing the Welcome Offer.

Users will earn 30 points for having spent $30, and then receive an additional 30 points for completing the Challenge.


Total points: ($30*1) + 30 = 60

Problems re:Challenge card design

Decisions

Ultimately, I decided on these points:


Showing the point value of just the Challenges in the headers, vs. showing point value plus points earned from spend


Not needing to explain that the 10x points Welcome Offer applies to everything, including Challenges


When describing Challenges and their point value, saying “after [action]” instead of “when [action]”. This is because the focus is solely on the points earned from the challenge, not on the points earned from spend.

01

Users will likely think that the 10x Welcome Offer applies to all points earned, not dollars spent; i.e. if they earn 60 points for a Challenge, they might expect 600 points

02

Unclear what point value to show on the Challenge cards

60 points – is this clear that it’s 30 points for spend, and 30 for completion? Will they think that the 60 points is just for completion?

30 points – is this clear that it’s just 30 points for completing the Challenge, and they’ll get another 30 for spend?

03

(Where) should there be a section in the beginning explaining that the 10x Welcome Offer will affect Challenges? Will users even care? If someone was expecting 30 points and they get 330 instead, would they be upset about it?

impact

At the time, we’d expected this program to reach 3M US advertisers/year once it became available to the general public, and 5M advertisers once it launched globally. When I left, scaled and beta testing were in progress.


Unfortunately, I don’t have specific datapoints—but I do know that the initial learnings were promising. About half of the advertisers who clicked on the entry points ended up enrolling in the program.

bay area, ca

email me